English한국어日本語EspañolDeutschFrançais
FREE · LOCAL ANALYSIS

PK Noncompartmental Analysis

AUC · Cmax · Tmax · t½ · CL/F · Vz/F

Transparent modelExample dataLocal processingReview methodology →
ADVANCED ANALYSIS · RUO

PK Noncompartmental Analysis

AUC · Cmax · Tmax · t½ · CL/F · Vz/F

Calculated locally in this browser

Column order: time_h, concentration

Editable data table
time_hconcentration
Paste CSV / TSV

Analysis result

AUC₀–t49.81
AUC₀–∞50.81
Cmax10.2
Tmax1
t½4.334
CL/F0.1968
Vz/F1.231
Terminal R²0.9856
Loading chart…

Research use only. Validate raw data, exclusions and interpretation against the approved analysis plan.

PRACTICAL GUIDE

Use the result with confidence.

Use this noncompartmental analysis calculator to summarize a concentration–time profile with AUC₀–t, extrapolated AUC₀–∞, Cmax, Tmax, terminal half-life, apparent clearance and volume. The selected terminal-point count and regression fit remain visible because extrapolated exposure depends on the terminal phase.

Open the calculator
WORKED EXAMPLES

Check the calculation in context.

EXAMPLE 01

Single-dose profile with a supported terminal phase

How is AUC₀–∞ separated from observed exposure?

  1. Sort valid concentrations by time and integrate through the last measurable observation.
  2. Fit the predefined positive terminal concentrations on the log scale.
  3. Add the final observed concentration divided by the terminal rate constant.
Result

AUC₀–∞ equals observed AUC₀–t plus the extrapolated tail area.

Interpretation: Report the extrapolated fraction and terminal regression diagnostics; a computed value is not reliable when the terminal phase is poorly supported.

EXAMPLE 02

Terminal points changed from three to four

Why can half-life and clearance change?

  1. The terminal slope is estimated from the selected late observations.
  2. Adding a distribution-phase point can steepen or flatten that slope.
  3. AUC extrapolation, half-life, clearance and volume therefore change together.
Result

Terminal-point selection is an analysis decision, not a cosmetic setting.

Interpretation: Use a prespecified selection rule and inspect the concentration–time profile rather than choosing points solely for the highest R².

COMMON MISTAKES

Correct numbers can still lead to a poor experiment.

01

Using unsorted or duplicate times without review

NCA integration assumes an interpretable time sequence, and replicate handling changes the profile.

What to do

Apply the study-defined replicate and below-quantification rules before analysis, then verify chronological order.

02

Selecting terminal points only by R²

A high R² can still describe distribution rather than terminal elimination.

What to do

Use pharmacological context, visual inspection and a prespecified minimum terminal span in addition to regression diagnostics.

03

Ignoring dose and unit consistency

Clearance and volume inherit the units of dose, time and concentration.

What to do

Document dose basis, bioavailability interpretation and every input unit before reporting derived parameters.

REPORTING NOTES

Document the calculation clearly.

Copy a methods-ready sentence or preparation checklist, then adapt it to your actual protocol, instrument and acceptance criteria.

Methods sentence

Noncompartmental analysis used the stated trapezoidal convention and a prespecified set of terminal positive concentrations for log-linear regression.

Result sentence

Report dose and route, concentration and time units, AUC₀–t, AUC₀–∞, extrapolated fraction, Cmax, Tmax, terminal slope, half-life, regression diagnostics and apparent clearance or volume notation.

FAQ

Questions researchers often ask.

What is the difference between AUC0-t and AUC0-infinity?

AUC₀–t integrates observed exposure through the last measurable concentration. AUC₀–∞ adds an estimated terminal tail and is more dependent on terminal-phase support.

How many terminal points should be used?

At least three positive observations are generally needed to fit a line, but the correct selection depends on the prespecified analysis rule, sampling design and whether the points represent terminal elimination.

Does the calculator handle BLQ values automatically?

No universal BLQ rule is imposed. Apply the study-specific below-quantification and missing-data procedure before entering the analysis dataset.

Are clearance and volume absolute after extravascular dosing?

Without known bioavailability, they are typically apparent parameters such as CL/F and Vz/F. Route and dose interpretation must be reported.

NEXT WORKFLOW

Continue beyond a single calculation.

Review the connected workflow for experimental context, quality checks and related tools.

Pharmacokinetics & exposure workflow
INPUT FORMAT

Data requirements

Enter at least 2 time points with non-negative numeric concentrations.

time_h, concentration
INTERPRETATION

Review before reporting

Research use only. Validate raw data, exclusions and interpretation against the approved analysis plan.

Check raw observations, excluded rows, model assumptions and study-specific acceptance criteria before using the result.

METHOD

Transparent analysis

Inputs are processed locally in your browser. Review the calculation policy, limitations and verification approach before reporting a result.

Read the methodology →
EVIDENCE & REVIEW

A result you can audit.

Reviewed 12 August 2026AUC and terminal-phase calculation review complete
01

Implementation check

The workflow sorts concentration-time observations, applies linear trapezoids and exposes terminal regression fit before deriving half-life, AUC extrapolation, apparent clearance and volume.

02

Interpretation boundary

NCA results depend on sampling coverage, BQL rules, dose and route definitions, terminal-point selection and the suitability of log-linear extrapolation. Confirmatory work requires the approved analysis environment.

REFERENCE VALIDATION CASE

Linear trapezoid exposure

(10+5)/2 × 1 + (5+2.5)/2 × 1.

Inputs
  • Time: 0, 1, 2 h
  • Concentration: 10, 5, 2.5
  • Linear trapezoids
Expected result
  • Cmax = 10
  • Tmax = 0 h
  • AUC₀–last = 11.25 concentration·h
CHECK IDLAB-VAL-009TOLERANCEAUC absolute error ≤ 0.001LAST RUN13 August 2026AUTOMATED CHECKSorting, Cmax/Tmax and linear-trapezoid AUC

Scope: Terminal regression and extrapolated parameters need adequate later samples.

Review and correction history

12 August 2026 · Internal implementation review

AUC and terminal-phase calculation review complete. Formula behavior, unit handling, limitations and linked references were checked internally.

Independent reviewer: Not yet published. A name, relevant qualification, date and exact scope will appear here only after a real review is completed.

Source-informed and internally checked; independent scientific or regulatory validation is not claimed. Research use only.

TOSSORAMain site